|
March 2006
Closet Merlot Drinkers, Unite!
There's no reason to hide our love of top-notch Merlot.
By Thom
Elkjer
The current attitude among wine fans about Merlot - don't get caught dead
with it - is a fashion trend, not a wine evaluation. Like many bashin'-fashions,
it arose in response to over-exposure. Starbucks was cool once, before it was
on every block downtown. Even Jennifer Lopez went from scorching hot to the,
ahem, butt of jokes when she put out too many movies, videos, and albums too
quickly. Same with Merlot. So it's useful to remember when Merlot was first
emerging into the limelight.
That was back in the 1980s, when Dan Duckhorn, Sandra MacIver and others like them
were experimenting with moving Merlot out of Cabernet Sauvignon's shadow. The French had
been using Merlot for generations as an invisible blending component that made Cabernet
Sauvignon into a complete wine, meaning a wine that offers everything from aromas through
flavors to the finish at the same high level. Such blending was necessary more often than
not in overcast France, and at first California winemakers followed suit.
But then winemakers in sunny California and equally sunny eastern Washington discovered
that Merlot could make a complete wine on its own. Furthermore, when it was grown alongside
Cabernet in choice vineyard spots, it could offer similar complexity and ageworthiness as
well.
Then
Fetzer decided in 1994 to sell half a million cases of Merlot annually by the year
1999. It was an audacious, visionary goal, but under winemaker Dennis Martin, Fetzer reached
it a year early and kept flying right past it. Other big wineries chased them hot and hard.
These mega-producers didn't worry too much about where they planted their new Merlot vines,
or where they bought the grapes they couldn't grow themselves. The aim was to own a piece
of a huge national market. The result, of course, was a steady diminishing of quality.
Nevertheless, a huge market still opened up. The reason - don't be astonished - is that
people liked Merlot. This was especially true if they were new to wine. They liked Merlot's
softness, its natural sweetness, its ability to meld into most meals without challenging the
food. Most of all they liked Merlot's ability to go from supermarket shelf to cocktail hour
or the dinner table within hours, if not minutes.
But only a tiny, tiny fraction of that huge national Merlot was drinking the Merlot from
Duckhorn, Etude, L'Ecole No. 41, Leonetti, Northstar, Pahlmeyer, Paloma, Pride, Provenance,
Selene, Shafer and Turnbull, or the high-end bottlings from Sterling and other mass-market
Merlot producers. These are serious wines, complete wines, the kind collectors stash away
for later.
And that's how I became a closet Merlot drinker. I don't mean I'm hiding my Merlot
drinking from people because it's unfashionable. I mean I literally put good Merlots on
the floor of a closet in my office, where it's cool and dark and quiet. Then when I want
a wine that I know will impress (even if I'm the only one drinking it), I dig into the
closet and pull out a marvelous Merlot. I started doing this back in the 1990s as a
corrective to the Merlot's rise to overexposure - and because I can't afford Cabernets
that rank as high as the best Merlots. I'm still on the 1999s, about to move to the 2000s,
and loving every unfashionable sip.
|